{"id":1584,"date":"2017-08-02T10:07:58","date_gmt":"2017-08-02T09:07:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/workshop.spine-biomechanics.com\/2017\/?page_id=1584"},"modified":"2024-11-05T10:58:55","modified_gmt":"2024-11-05T09:58:55","slug":"program","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/workshop.spine-biomechanics.com\/2017\/program\/","title":{"rendered":"Program"},"content":{"rendered":"

2nd<\/sup> Workshop 2017 topics<\/h1>\n
\n
\n
<\/span>1. Intervertebral Discs<\/div>
\n\u25b9”Are long-term axial intervertebral disc biomechanics determined by osmosis?” by Pieter P. Vergroesen (Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
\n\u25b9”The effect of the osmotic gradient on water content and pressure in the intervertebral disc” by Kaj S. Emanuel (Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
\n\u25b9”Computational study of the role of fluid content and flow on the disc response in cyclic compression: On how to replicate in vivo conditions” by Petra Vel\u00edskov\u00e1 (Berlin, Germany)
\n\u25b9”Comparison of constitutive models for describing the six degree of freedom creep bahaviour of human intervertebral discs” by John J. Costi (Adelaide, Australia)
\n\u25b9”Biomechanical response of intact and degenerated intervertebral discs under impact loading” by Kinda Khalaf (Abu Dhabi, UAE)
\n\u25b9”Integrating collagen fiber orientations derived from diffusion weighted MRI into a finite element model of the intervertebral disc” by Marc Stadelmann (Bern, Switzerland)
\n<\/div><\/div>\n
<\/span>2. Motion Segments: Biomechanics<\/div>
\n\u25b9”Effect of inter-individual disc geometry variation on load-bearing of the lumbar unit L4-L5″ by Marwan El-Rich (Edmonton, Canada)
\n\u25b9”Effects of eight different spine ligament property datasets on biomechanics of an L4-L5 finite element model” by Sadegh Naserkhaki (Tehran, Iran)
\n\u25b9”Load-sharing in the lumbosacral spine in neutral standing & flexed postures – A combined finite element and inverse dynamic study” by Tao Liu (Edmonton, Canada)
\n\u25b9”The effect of posterior element removal on coupled motions in human and porcine thoracic and lumbar spines” by Idsart Kingma (Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
\n\u25b9”Dynamic stiffening of lumbar spinal specimens” by Gerd Huber (Hamburg, Germany)
\n\u25b9”Spine system equivalence: A new protocol for standardized multi-axis comparison tests” by Timothy Holsgrove (Exeter, UK)
\n<\/div><\/div>\n
<\/span>3. Lumbar Spine Kinematics<\/div>
\n\u25b9”How do we stand? Variations during repeated standing phases of asymptomatic subjects and low back pain patients” by Jeronimo Weerts (Berlin, Germany)
\n\u25b9”Are there characteristic motion patterns in the lumbar spine during flexion?” by Thomas Zander (Berlin, Germany)
\n\u25b9”Kinetic control of lumbar spine flexion-extension movement using proportional derivative (PD)
\ncontroller, feedback lineariza-tion method and their combinations” by Mohamad Parnianpour (Tehran, Iran)
\n\u25b9”Model-based estimation of changes in lumbar spine kinematics with alterations in trunk neuromuscular strategy” by Babak Bazrgari (Lexington, United States)
\n\u25b9”Variations in lumbar facet kinematics across segments during in vivo extension movement” by Ameet Aiyangar (Duebendorf, Switzerland)
\n\u25b9”Estimation of spinal joint centers from external spinal profile and anatomical landmarks” by Agathe N\u00e9rot (Paris, France)
\n<\/div><\/div>\n
<\/span>4. Spinal Loads \u2013 In Vivo Measurements & Modeling<\/div>
\n\u25b9”Subject-specific regression equations to estimate spinal loads in symmetric lifting” by Farshid Ghezelbash (Montr\u00e9al, Canada)
\n\u25b9”Obesity and spinal loads, a combined MR imaging and subject-specific modeling investigation” by Navid Arjmand (Tehran, Iran)
\n\u25b9”Vertebral loading predictions are influenced by incorporation of CT-based measurements of trunk anatomy into subject-specific musculoskeletal models of the thoracolumbar spine” by Hossein Mokhtarzadeh (Boston, United States)
\n\u25b9”Spinal loads and trunk muscles forces during level walking – A combined in vivo and in silico study on six subjects” by Rizwan Arshad (Berlin, Germany)
\n\u25b9”Subject – Specific validation of a trunk musculoskeletal model in maximum voluntary exertions” by Andre Plamondon (Montr\u00e9al, Canada)
\n\u25b9”Estimation of in vivo inter-vertebral loading during motion using fluoroscopic and magnetic resonance image informed finite element models” by Judith Meakin (Exeter, UK)
\n<\/div><\/div>\n
<\/span>5. Spinal Loads \u2013 Computational Models<\/div>
\n\u25b9”Sensitivity of intervertebral joint forces to center of rotation location and trends along its migration path” by Marco Senteler (Zurich, Switzerland)
\n\u25b9”Effects of joint positioning and stiffness on spinal loads and kinematics in trunk musculoskeletal models” by Saeed Shirazi-Adl (Montr\u00e9al, Canada)
\n\u25b9”A combined passive and active musculoskeletal model study to estimate L4-L5 load sharing” by Navid Arjmand (Tehran, Iran)
\n\u25b9”Effects of hand-held loads at various orientations, heights and magnitudes on spine biomechanics in upright posture” by Zakaria El Ouaaid (Montr\u00e9al, Canada)
\n\u25b9”Thoracolumbar spine loading during activities of daily living performed by the young and the elderly” by Dominika Ignasiak (Zurich, Switzerland)
\n\u25b9”Effect of arm swinging on lumbar spine and hip joint forces” by Lorenza Angelini (Berlin, Germany)
\n<\/div><\/div>\n
<\/span>6. Instrumentation<\/div>
\n\u25b9”Live demonstration of telemetry hip implant measurements” by Phillip Damm (Berlin, Germany)
\n\u25b9”Functional in vitro testing of pedicle screw anchorage” by Werner Schmoelz (Innsbruck, Austria)
\n\u25b9”An under-sized pedicle screw reaches a similar biomechanical performance as an over-sized screw after fatigue loading \u2013 an in-vitro human cadaveric study” by Jaw-Lin Wang (Taipei, Taiwan)
\n\u25b9”Development and validation of a \u03bcFEA model for the investiga-tion of the pedicle-screw-bone-interface under different loading conditions” by Yan Chevalier (Munich, Germany)
\n\u25b9”On the clinical relevance of international standards for preclini-cal evaluation of posterior stabilization devices” by Luigi La Barbera (Milano, Italy)
\n<\/div><\/div>\n
<\/span>7. Neuromuscular Response<\/div>
\n\u25b9”Superimposed eccentric sudden trunk loading: Effect on trunk peak torque and muscle activity” by Steffen Mueller (Potsdam, Germany)
\n\u25b9”Effect of high-intensity perturbations during core-specific sen-sorimotor exercises on trunk muscle activation pattern” by Juliane Mueller (Berlin, Germany)
\n\u25b9”Systems identification of trunk stabilization suggest acceleration sensitivity of muscle spindle feedback” by Jaap H. van Die\u00ebn (Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
\n\u25b9”Muscle strength and neuromuscular control in low back pain: elite athletes vs. general population” by Maria Moreno Catal\u00e1 (Berlin, Germany)
\n\u25b9”Generating desired optimal trajectory of trunk for rhythmic and discrete sagittal movement by central pattern generators” by Mohamad Parnianpour (Tehran, Iran)
\n\u25b9”Subject specific proprioceptive control model for spine disorders analysis” by Wafa Skalli (Paris, France)
\n\u25b9”Does multifidus muscle disruption cause intervertebral discs degeneration in the lumbar spine of rat?” by Huub Maas (Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
\n<\/div><\/div>\n
<\/span>8. Spine Biomechanics<\/div>
\n\u25b9”Ambulatory hand force estimation during manual lifting using an inertial sensor suit and instrumented force shoes” by Gert Faber (Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
\n\u25b9”Estimating the L5S1 moment using a simplified ambulatory measurement setup” by Axel S. Koopman (Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
\n\u25b9”Mechanical demands of a lowering and lifting task on the lower back of patients with acute low back pain” by Babak Bazrgari (Lexington, United States)
\n\u25b9”Faster walking speeds differentially alter spinal loads in persons with traumatic lower limb amputations” by Brad Hendershot (Bethesda, United States)
\n\u25b9”The rib cage affects intervertebral disc pressures in dynamic tests of cadaveric thoracic spines” by Dennis E. Anderson (Boston, United States)
\n\u25b9”The contribution of the ribcage to thoracolumbar spine biome-chanics in a sheep model: progress towards a validated compu-tational representation of ribcage biomechanics” by J Paige Little (Brisbane, Australia)
\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>\n

\"Download<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Download “Workshop 2017: Program & Abstract-Book”<\/a><\/strong> (8.5 Mb)<\/h3>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"2nd Workshop 2017 topics Download “Workshop 2017: Program & Abstract-Book” (8.5 Mb)","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1584","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/workshop.spine-biomechanics.com\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1584"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/workshop.spine-biomechanics.com\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/workshop.spine-biomechanics.com\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/workshop.spine-biomechanics.com\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/workshop.spine-biomechanics.com\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1584"}],"version-history":[{"count":21,"href":"https:\/\/workshop.spine-biomechanics.com\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1584\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1746,"href":"https:\/\/workshop.spine-biomechanics.com\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1584\/revisions\/1746"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/workshop.spine-biomechanics.com\/2017\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1584"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}